|
Exercise intensity for older
clients
by Reed Humphrey, Ph.D., P.T.
Regular aerobic exercise, along
with a sensible program of flexibility and resistance exercise,
is valuable in reducing health risk, improving quality of life,
prolonging functional independence and, possibly, increasing a person's
life span. A variety of guidelines exist for individuals setting
up exercise programs or modifying programs to maximize the physiological
benefit. Among these guidelines, widespread agreement exists that
the cardiovascular component of exercise should result in about
30 minutes of aerobic activity on most days of the week. To improve
fitness, research suggests exercise on a minimum of three days per
week; to manage weight, exercise on more days is necessary to increase
the overall caloric effect, plus exercise duration should probably
progress from 30 minutes to as much as one hour.
Most people can identify the
quantity of aerobic exercise neededat least in duration (minutes
per session) and frequency (days per week). What is unclear to many
people is the exercise intensity, or effort, needed to achieve the
optimal health and fitness outcome.
Research seems to suggest
a pattern that makes intuitively good sense: lower intensity effort
results in important physical and mental health benefits, which
can include weight loss if the individual exercises more. As the
effort level gradually increases, the benefits of significantly
improved fitness begin to materialize, i.e. independence and perhaps
reduced mortality. So part of the intensity question is related
to desired outcome(s).
All too often, health
and wellness professionals will advise older adults that they need
to exercise at a moderate to high level to maximize health benefits.
But older exercisers can achieve critically important health benefits
from lower intensity effort, such as walking at a comfortable, conversational
pace. This fact is often overlooked by both health and wellness
professionals and the public, which likely contributes to the high
proportion of people who do not engage in any leisure time activity.
Data from recent years shows
an alarming trend towards less activity, and the rates of diabetes
and obesity have increased to levels certain to derail affordable
healthcare unless these trends are reversed. As America ages, an
emphasis on exercise even at the lowest effort level will be necessary
to stem the economic and sociological burden of chronic illness
that could largely be prevented by regular exercise.
Most individuals can achieve
the benefits afforded by regular exercise by eventually setting
the level of exercise close to their "conversational limit"
during exercise, which is associated with more labored breathing.
Breathing pattern is probably the simplest marker that divides lower
and higher intensity exercise. Physiologically, the sharper increase
in breathing that impairs the ability to converse during exercise
is closely associated with fitness level.
Higher exercise levels challenge
the body to deliver the energy necessary to sustain the effort,
resulting in labored breathing. Effort at this level causes the
body to adapt, which confers the benefits associated with higher
intensity exercise. But exercise close to this level will also confer
benefits greater than very easy exercise. In addition, as a person's
fitness level improves, his/her conversational limit likewise will
increase, permitting the exerciser to achieve higher levels of effort
before being limited by labored breathing.
It's best to consider health
benefits as a continuum. The key is to provide the highest, comfortable
level of exercise that clients can tolerate for upwards of 30-60
minutes, depending on an individual's relative need for improved
physical fitness (30 minutes) or weight loss (upwards of 60 minutes).
If exercise effort impedes an
individual's willingness to continue a program, the health or wellness
professional should slow down to ensure the person stays with the
program. The client will still accrue significant health benefits
at this lower intensity level. And there is plenty of time to increase
effort level as the person's general health and fitness improves.
Reed Humphrey, Ph.D., P.T.,
is an associate professor in the Department of Physical & Occupational
Therapy at Idaho State University. He is currently U.S. Delegate
and Secretary-General, World Council for Cardiovascular and Pulmonary
Rehabilitation, plus a fellow and past president (1995-96) of the
American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation.
Humphrey is also a fellow of the American College of Sports Medicine,
and served as associate editor of ACSM's Guidelines for Graded Exercise
Testing and Prescription, fifth edition, and the recently published
ACSM's Resources for Clinical Exercise Physiology.
Relevant resources
American College of Sports Medicine.
ACSM Position Stand on The Recommended Quantity and Quality of Exercise
for Developing and Maintaining Cardiorespiratory and Muscular Fitness,
and Flexibility in Adults. Medicine & Science in Sports &
Exercise 1998;30:975-991
Howley, E.T. You Ask for It:
Question Authority. The equation of 220-age. ACSM Health & Fitness
Journal 2000;4:6
American College of Sports Medicine.
ACSM's Guidelines for Graded Exercise Testing and Prescription,
6th ed. Baltimore MD: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2000
|